Review on Development of Ice-Ship

  • Efi Afrizal Department of Aeronautical, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, University Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • J. Koto Department of Aeronautical, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, University Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia; Ocean and Aerospace Engineering Research Institute, Indonesia

Abstract

In the early stage, sailing by ships at North and Artic Seas should be able to break ice which is commonly called as ice-breakers. Dimensions of the ice breakers were not big enough to be used as a cargo or large carrier. As the demand to merchant ships has been increased, the development technologies on hull form design and propulsion system for ice-going ship have been improved gradually. This paper discussed historical ice ships, the development of ships in ice such as ice breaker, double acting ship and offshore floating by taken two parameters into account which is hull form design and propulsion system.

##Keywords:## Ship in Ice, Double Acting Ship, Podded Propulsion.
Published
Aug 30, 2016
How to Cite
AFRIZAL, Efi; KOTO, J.. Review on Development of Ice-Ship. Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering-, [S.l.], v. 34, n. 1, p. 6 - 15, aug. 2016. ISSN 2527-6085. Available at: <https://www.isomase.org/Journals/index.php/jomase/article/view/405>. Date accessed: 30 may 2026. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase.v34i1.405.

References

1. Stephen J. Jones, 2004, Ships In Ice - A Review, 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada,8-13 August.
2. Gürtner, A, 2009, Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Ice-Structure Interaction. Ph.D Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
3. Juurma, K., Mattson, T., Sasaki, N., Wilkman. G. The development of the Double Acting Tanker for Ice Operation, Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice. February 24-28, 2012. Mombetsu, Japan. 2012.
4. Wilkman. G., Arpiainen. M., Niini. M, Mattson, T. Experience of Azipod Vessels in Ice, Aker Arctic Technology Inc. Helsinki, Finland. 2005.
5. Jaswar. Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Going. Proceeding of the 5th Osaka Colloquium on advanced Research on Ship Viscous Flow and Hull Form Design by EFD and CFD Approaches. Osaka, Japan. 2005.
6. Aker Arctic Technology Inc., Arctic Shuttle Tanker MT "Vasily Dinkov", Helsinki, Finland: Brochure. 2007. 7. Aker Arctic Technology Inc, 70.000 DWT Arctic Shuttle Tanker MT "Mikhail Ulyanov" “MT Kirill Lavrov”, Helsinki, Finland: Brochure. 2010.
8. Tan, X, 2014, Numerical Investigation of Ship's, Ph.D Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
9. Krzysztof Kubiak, 2014, Russian Double Action Ships Arctic Shipping Revolution or Costly Experiment, Ph.D Thesis. Jan Kochanowski University.
10. Aker Arctic Technology, 2011, Improve Double Acting Ship. Helsinki, Finland: Artic Passion News.
11. Vocke. M., Ranki. E., Uuskallio. A., Niini. M., Wilkman. G., 2001, Experience of Vessels Operating in Ice in Double Acting Principle. February 7-9, Offshore Technology Conference. 1-3.
12. Watson, D. G. M, 1979, Some Ship Design Method. Royal Institution of Naval Architects. 183 Bath Street, Glasgow: IEEE. November 9, Page 279-302.
13. David, F and Linda,T, 2015, Prediction of High-Speed Planing Hull Resistance and Running Attitude. Master Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology.
14. Wilcox, D.C, 1994, Simulation of Transition with a Two Equation Turbulence Model, AIAA Journal. 32 (2). 247-255.
15. Andersson, B., Andersson, R., Håkansson, L., Mortensen, M., Sudiyo, R., van Wachem, B. G. M, 2014, Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers, 10th ed. Cambridge University Press.
16. Menter, R. B. Langtry, S. R. Likki, Y. B. Suzen, P. G. Huang, and S. Volker. A, 2004, Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables, Part I – Model Formulation. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Power for Land, Sea, and Air, June 14-17, Vienna, Austria: ASME. 2004. GT2004-53452.
17. Tousif Ahmed, Md. Tanjin Amin, S.M. Rafiqul Islam and Shabbir Ahmed, 2013, Computational Study of Flow around a NACA 0012 Wing Flapped at Different Flap Angles with Varying Mach Numbers, Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, 13 (4), 5-15.
18. Bardina, J., Huang, P., Coakley, T, 1997, Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development, Technical report 110446. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
19. Stern, F., Yang, J., Wang, Z., Sadat-Hosseini, H., Mousaviraad, M., Bhushan, S., et al, 2013, Computational Ship Hydrodynamics: Nowadays and Way Forward. International Shipbuilding Progress; 60(1-4):3–105, doi: 10.3233/ISP-130090.
20. White, F. M, 2003, Fluid mechanics. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
21. Versteeg, H. K., Malalasekera, W. 2007, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
22. Su, B. 2011, Numerical Predictions of Global and Local Ice Loads on Ships. Ph.D Thesis. University of Science and Technology.
23. Afrizal. E, Jaswar, 2014, Ice Resistance Performance Analysis of Double Acting Tanker in Astern Condition, Jurnal Teknologi (Science and Engineering), 69 (7), 73–78.
24. Edward, V.L, 1988, Principles of Naval Architecture. 2nd ed. Jersey City, NJ.: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
25. Wilkman, G, Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Laapio, J., Fagerström, B, 2004, Full-scale experience of Double Acting Tankers (DAT) Mastera and Tempera, Proceedings of IAHR, 4- June, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1-9.
26. Eyres, D. J, Ship Construction, 5th ed. Woburn, MA. Butterworth-Heinemann 2001.
27. International Towing Tank Conference, 2011, Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Application, No. 7.5-03-02-03.
28. Sridar. D, Bhanuprakash, T.V.K, Das. H. N, 2010, Frictional Resistance Calculations on a Ship using CFD, International Journal of Computer Applications, 11(5): 24-31.
29. Watson, D.G.M, 1998, Practical Ship Design. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd. 1998.